top of page
Search

RNC Presidential Candidate Vetted for Sole-Allegiance as Natural Born Citizen in 1916

Updated: Feb 21, 2023


February 20, 2023



On the eve of Presidents Day 2023, Nikki Haley launched her Presidential campaign at a campaign rally even though she is ineligible, since she is not a natural born citizen; one of the three requirements in Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution. Haley is banking on the “Two Wrongs Make a Right” fallacy after Kamala Harris usurped the Constitution in 2020 with multiple allegiances, including the nationality of Indian from her mother.


"we were the only Indian family"
"we were the only Indian family"

"daughter of Indian immigrants"
"daughter of Indian immigrants"

Article II Guardians, steadfastly holds the antithetical view to Haley; believing “It’s Never a Wrong Time to Do the Right Thing.”


Because the Chief Executive is also the Commander-in-Chief of the nation’s Armed Forces, the Framers required a natural-born citizen with sole-allegiance for the Office of the Presidency as a strong check against foreign influence. Haley is disqualified because neither of her parents were U.S. Citizens at the time of her birth. Being born in South Carolina to two alien parents, Nikki Haley is a citizen of the United States, naturalized “at birth” under the Fourteenth Amendment; but not an Article II natural-born citizen of the United States.


Don’t take our word for it.


Justice Rehnquist of the U.S. Supreme Court said being a citizen is not sufficient to be President, that one must be a natural born citizen, which Haley is not due to her multiple allegiances at birth.

Access source document at Library of Congress here.


Haley can wish it away, but there it is.


Trump called Haley disloyal, and while he may be brazen; it rings true for he knows her divided loyalties make her ineligible for the Presidency to begin with. This isn’t Trump’s first rodeo.


Trump ran against Kamala Harris whose parents were not U.S. citizens when she was born and therefore, not a natural born citizen.


Question: There are claims circulating on social media that Kamala Harris is not eligible to be — to run for Vice President because she was an “anchor baby,” I quote. Do you or can you definitively say whether or not Kamala Harris is eligible — legal — and meets the legal requirements to run as Vice President?

Trump: So, I just heard that. I heard it today that she doesn’t meet the requirements. And, by the way, the lawyer that wrote that piece is a very highly qualified, very talented lawyer. I have no idea if that’s right. I would’ve — I would have assumed the Democrats would have checked that out before she gets chosen to run for Vice President.


Trump ran against Ted Cruz who was born in Canada and not a natural born citizen. In 2016, Trump expressed genuine concern that Cruz’ birthplace in Canada is a “precarious issue” after he renounced his Canadian citizenship in 2014.


Trump, after “unofficially campaigning” between CPAC in February 2011 and his announcement not to half-heartedly run on May 16th, was informed by a delegation to Trump Tower on April 8th that Barack Obama was not a natural born citizen since his father was an alien. As documented in this recorded interview with the members of the delegation, Trump understood that being a natural born citizen with sole-allegiance was a Constitutional requirement; a wholly separate issue from Obama’s fraudulent ID’s, yet just as importantly deserved his attention. Trump can never claim to not know what a natural born citizen is, or that the Republic is being destroyed from within. Even Sun Yet Sen, China’s first President; had a Hawaiian birth certificate.


Photo courtesy Jeff Lichter with Surprise, AZ Tea Party Delegation at Trump Tower April 8, 2011
Photo courtesy Jeff Lichter with Surprise, AZ Tea Party Delegation at Trump Tower April 8, 2011

Surprise, AZ Tea Party Delegation Members: Rep. Carl Seel, Kelly Townsend, Jeff Lichter.


Trump ran against Lowell Weicker who was born in Paris, France and not a natural born citizen.





When interviewed by NBC’s “Today” show, Weicker said:

''I do know this: I want to win and you can't win with split allegiances like you're seeing out there right now or the perception that people that are running are just not qualified to be president of the United States.''


Trump’s greatest disservice to this country has been not seeking to adjudicate the many attempts to usurp the Constitution by ineligible Presidential candidates when he had standing to do so.


Article II Guardians however, is willing to take a stand and speak Truth to Power. The whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Here is incontrovertible proof from the Library of Congress that vetting against an ineligible Presidential candidate did in fact occur in 1916.



“Republican National Committee Handbook says Judge Hughes' father was naturalized at Kingston Ulster County, New York. Breck Long wishes to know record date of this naturalization. Can't you get and furnish him this information this week.”


The significance of this letter verifies that the date of naturalization for the father of Charles Evans Hughes was critical to the determination of whether the candidate was a natural born citizen. If Hughes’ father was naturalized after his birth, he would only be a U.S. citizen and not eligible. And since neither of Nikki Haley’s parents ever naturalized, Haley is not a natural born citizen and consequently ineligible.


A pertinent reminder is found in the annals of American history illustrating the importance of requiring sole-allegiance for the President and Commander in Chief with this sworn oath of allegiance by the infamous traitor Benedict Arnold.



So, on this Presidents Day 2023, let’s take heed from George Washington, the very first President and Commander in Chief as he warns future generations in his farewell address of the dangers of usurpation:


p. 621

“If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”



Although previous efforts to enforce Article II eligibility have reached the docket of the U.S. Supreme Court, every challenge was answered with silence and repeated injury. This inability to enforce the Constitutional qualifications for President of the United States, Commander-in-Chief of its Armed Forces, and Vice-President of the United States is a threat to national security and should not be mistaken for acquiescence.


Article 2 Guardians welcomes you to join us in this call-to-action to support and defend Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution as we work to establish a legally binding vetting apparatus for Presidential eligibility. Share this information with family, friends, neighbors, your State Representatives, fellow patriots and anyone seeking truth.



A2Guardians.com is now on Rumble! To get the latest Constitutional news and analysis from Article II Guardians, be sure to subscribe and share.


Twitter - @A2Guardians





89 views0 comments

Commentaires


bottom of page